European economy in a whole lot of trouble

June 11, 2009 — Mitul Kotecha

Concerns about the health of European banks, particularly German banks, and the pace of Eurozone economic recovery have intensified.  Warnings by the European Central Bank’s (ECB) about further financial sector weakness if there is not a “V” shaped recovery reveal the extent of such concerns.  Attention is increasingly focusing on a lack of transparency and the fact that European regulators are not releasing the results of industry wide stress tests in contrast to the recently released results of US bank stress tests.  Such problems have not gone unnoticed in Germany and even the bank regulator in the country said recently that toxic assets at German bank could blow up “like a grenade”. 

It’s worth noting that the IMF’s estimates for future writedowns and capital requirements in its financial stability report suggest that European banks have much more to do than their US counterparts. See an earlier post titled “Stress testing European and UK banks”.   The IMF repeated its warnings this week as it wrapped up its consultations with European officials, whilst US Treasury Secretary Geithner is set to pressure European authorities to carry out tougher stress tests at this week’s G8 meeting.   Germany has taken some steps towards resolving its banking sector problems and this week the German cabinet agreed to support a “bad bank” plan.  Nonetheless, the task will not be easy as Germany is estimated to have over $1 billion in toxic assets, with consolidation of the regionally owned Landesbanken a major concern. 

The prospect of a “V” shaped recovery in Europe is extremely limited.  Warnings about the pace of eurozone economic recovery should be taken seriously.  However, some officials such as the ECB’s Quaden are already talking about an exit strategy, which looks very premature given the likely slower recovery in the eurozone compared to the US over the coming months.  Whilst the US economy is set to see positive growth next year, albeit below trend, Europe is facing a second year of economic contraction.   Moreover, the drop in Eurozone growth in 2009 is likely to be far steeper than the US, with the economy set to decline by close to 5%.  The bigger than forecast 21.6% annual drop in German industrial production in April and the 29% annual drop in April exports released this week provided a timely reminder of the pressure on Eurozone’s biggest economy.  Given the fact that the German economy is still highly reliant on export growth the data were particularly worrying. 

Against this background and with inflation continuing to drop, the ECB is highly unlikely to raise interest rates until the beginning of 2011 at the earliest.  The fact that ECB officials are even talking about an exit strategy seems completely at odds with the reality of the situation.  As it is the ECB’s EUR 60 billion covered bond purchase plan will have a limited impact, and the policy can hardly be labeled as aggressive.  

Even so, there is no indication that the ECB is about to embark on more aggressive credit or quantitative easing.   The latest ECB monthly report predicts that growth in the eurozone will begin to pick up by the middle of next year but admits that inflation could turn negative over coming months.   Surely this will give the ECB further room to maintain easy monetary policy.   Once again disagreements within a 16 nation ECB council will result in compromise at a time when the eurozone economy is crying out for decisive policy actions.   Growth and banking sector concerns will also be a factor that helps to prevent the euro from fully capitalising on any weakness in the dollar.

Posted in central banks, Economics, Economy, Europe, Financial crisis, Germany, Interest rates, Monetary Policy. Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . 4 Comments »

Europe to recover at a snail’s pace

May 26, 2009 — Mitul Kotecha

There have been two pieces of data released over recent days which give us a good idea of the state of Europe’s biggest economy, Germany. The IFO survey – a crucial gauge of business confidence and an important forward looking indicator for the German economy, if not the whole eurozone economy – increased in May for the second straight month but came in lower than forecast. The second was the final reading of first quarter GDP, which confirmed the very steep 3.8% quarterly decline in growth, fuelled in large part by weaker exports.

Of course any improvement is encouraging but the fact that the rise in the IFO was less than expected highlights that the market has moved from excessive pessimism to being overly optimistic about recovery prospects. Moreover, at current levels the IFO remains at historically lows and still consistent with economic contraction. Admittedly it is at least consistent with a smaller pace of contraction in the economy in the months ahead but still way off indicating actual economic expansion.

The problem for Germany as highlighted by the GDP data is that the economy remains highly export dependent and given that global trade continues to shrink it points to very difficult times ahead. Moreover, the likelihood of a much bigger increase in unemployment and ongoing problems in the financial sector, points to the outlook for the consumer remaining very tough indeed for a long time to come.

Financial sector problems will only delay recovery.  A report in the UK’s Telegraph even carries a warning from the German bank regulator that toxic debts at German banks could blow up “like a grenade”. I won’t spend any more time on toxic debts at European banks but suggest reading a previous post titled “Stress testing European and UK banks” ,that highlights the lack of transparency and potential for much more writedowns in the months to come.

The problem is not just a German one. The eurozone economy is likely to recover much more slowly than the US despite the fact that the US was at the epicenter of the crisis. The major difference is that policy in the US is far more aggressive and rapid compared to Europe. European policymakers have struggled to put together any form of co-ordinated policy response and there is still an unwillingness from Germany to enact a fiscal stimulus package despite the fact the economy has weakened more rapidly than many other countries.

Moreover, conflict within the European Central Bank (ECB) council means that an aggressive move towards quantitative easing appears highly unlikely. The latest measure by the ECB to purchase EUR 60 billion in covered bonds hardly registered with markets. Faced with many opposing views from within the ECB representing many different countries this situation is unlikely to change anytime soon. As a result, Europe is destined for a snail’s pace of recovery, which could also stall the appreciation of the euro in the month ahead.

Posted in bank rescue, central banks, Economics, Economy, Europe, Financial crisis, Germany, Politics, US. Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . 1 Comment »

How compelling are equity valuations?

May 12, 2009 — Mitul Kotecha

Relief over the results of the US bank stress tests, better than expected US jobs data, generally less negative economic data in general, as well as better than expected Q1 earnings provided markets with plenty of fuel over recent days and weeks. This has helped to spur an improvement in risk appetite and a resultant strengthening in equity markets. Meanwhile, government bonds have sold off, commodity prices have risen and the USD has weakened.

At the time of writing the S&P 500 has recouped all its losses for the year, having climbed around 34% from its low on 9th March. To many this has sent a bullish signal about the path of the economy ahead given the historical lag of around 5 to 6-months between equity gains and economic recovery but to others include myself this is sending a false signal. Even if the economy stabilizes any recovery is likely to be slow.

As stocks have risen, cautiousness about the current rally has intensified, with many now calling for equities to correct lower. This could partly reflect sour grapes from those investors who have missed the move in equities (I like to think that I am not in this camp even if I did miss the move) but there is also an element of truth in terms of equity market valuations, which have risen sharply over recent weeks. Although arguing whether stocks are cheap or expensive depends on what measures are used there is even some caution coming from equity bulls.

Bloomberg estimates one measure of equity valuation, the Price / Earnings ratio of the S&P 500 at 14.78, which is still below the estimated P/E ratio of 15.96 but much higher than the P/E ratio of around 10 at the beginning of March. Other estimates also suggest that the current P/E ratio on the S&P 500 is approaching a long run average, which suggests that further upside for equities may be more difficult in the weeks ahead.

What now? So far markets have reacted to the fact that economic conditions are the past the worst and the reaction has reflected less negative economic data releases, with many data releases coming in ahead of expectations. Going forward, it will require actual positive news as opposed to less negative news to keep the momentum going. If positive news is lacking the improvement in risk appetite and equity market rally will falter, especially as valuations are arguably far less compelling now.

I would be interested in your view about whether you think the rally will continue. Please tick the the relevant circle in poll on the sidebar to give your view and also view what others are thinking.

Posted in bank rescue, Bond markets, Commodities, Currencies, Economics, equity markets, Financial crisis, US, US administration. Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , . 5 Comments »

Stress testing European and UK banks

May 8, 2009 — Mitul Kotecha

The US bank stress tests are finally over and markets are breathing a massive sign of relief. 10 out of the 19 banks tested will have to raise $74.6bn in equity but none of the 19 banks will become insolvent, with additional capital requirements deemed as “manageable”.

It hardly seemed worth getting all stressed up over the stress tests but the results are likely to prompt much debate about the methodology used and will not put to bed the issue of the health of the US financial sector and potential for even more capital raising in the future. This should be the theme of another post but for now I want to discuss what this means for European and UK banks.

The stress tests raise questions about whether the European and UK banking sector should follow the US.  The US administration has used the ratio of tangible common equity to total assets for its stress tests on US banks. This measure has been labeled as old fashioned but one that investors currently prefer. This is also the measure the IMF has used in its recent calculations to work our additional capital requirements for banks globally.

The IMF financial stability report estimated additional credit related writedowns in 2009 and 2010 at $550bn in the US, $750bn in the eurozone, and $200bn in the UK. The IMF estimates that the ratio of tangible common equity to total assets was 3.7% in the US at end 2008 but only 2.5% in the eurozone and 2.1% in the UK. It concludes that the extra capital needed to increase this ratio to 6% would be $500bn in the US, $725bn in the eurozone and $250 billion in the UK.

So will be there similar stress tests in Europe and the UK? The increased transparency that the stress test results have brought about in the US is good news for investors even if no bank was ever going to fail them but they raise a potentially worrying comparison with European and UK  banks which appear to have been far less forthcoming. The figures have been disputed by eurozone and UK officials but assuming the IMF is right the estimates raise some disturbing questions about financial sector health outside the US.

Posted in bank rescue, Economics, Europe, Financial crisis, US, US administration. Tags: , , , , , , . 5 Comments »

Show me the money

May 3, 2009 — Mitul Kotecha

The long awaited results of the US administration’s stress tests for US bank will be announced on May 7th. There have been various rumours and speculation about the details in terms of the extent that banks will require further capital injections and indeed which banks will need such injections. Ahead of the announcement I thought it would be an interesting exercise to look at the potential equity needed in the global financial sector.

Some light on this was shed by the IMF’s recent release of the Global Financial Stability Report in which the fund increased its total estimates of global writedowns to over $4 trillion. The most recent estimates of financial sector writdowns suggest that institutions are only about one-third of the way there.

In other words there is still a considerable amount of writedowns on toxic debt left to be undertaken. The IMF estimated further writedowns in the US in 2009 and 2010 at $550 billion, $750 billion in the eurozone and $200 billion in the UK.

Moreover, they estimate that financial institutions will require $500 billion of additional capital in the US, $725 billion in the eurozone and $250 billion in the UK just to raise the ratio of common equity to total assets (a measure of leverage) to 6%. Even these estimates may prove conservative. After all, the IMF has raised its estimates of total writedowns several times already and will likely do so again. These figures do not even include the need for other financing which when added amounts to around 60% of Bank’s total assets.

The bottom line is that even with all the money that is being provided to financial institutions at present it will be highly unlikely that they will be able to raise sufficient capital if the IMF’s estimates are anything to go by. Consequently balance sheets will contract sharply and deleveraging will continue.  Governments will be forced to provide support for a long time to come and the end result will be either outright nationalisation or alternatively bankruptcy for some institutions that are deemed not too big to fail.  Worryingly the risks are skewed on the downside, especially if the economic recovery is a weak one which I believe is highly likely to be the case.

Posted in bank rescue, Economics, equity markets, Europe, Financial crisis, UK, US, US administration. Tags: , , , , , , . Leave a Comment »
« Older posts
Newer posts »