Risk trades under pressure

July 11, 2009 — Mitul Kotecha

Having given presentations in Hong Kong, China and South Korea in the past week and preparing to do the same in Taiwan and Singapore this week it is clear that there is a lot of uncertainty and caution in the air.  

There can be no doubt now that risk aversion has forcibly made its way back into the markets psyche.  Government bonds, the US dollar and the Japanese yen have gained more ground against the background of higher risk aversion. 

Following a tough week in which global equity markets slumped, oil fell below $60 per barrel and risk currencies including many emerging market currencies weakened, the immediate outlook does not look particularly promising.

Data releases are not giving much for markets to be inspired about despite upgrades to economic growth forecasts by the IMF even if their outlook remains cautious.  US trade data revealed a bigger than expected narrowing in the deficit in May whilst US consumer confidence fell more than expected in July as rising unemployment took its toll on sentiment.   There was also some disappointment towards the end of the week as the Bank of England did not announce an increase in its asset purchase facility despite much speculation that it would do so.

Rising risk aversion is manifesting itself in the usual manner in currency markets.  The Japanese yen is grinding higher and having failed to weaken when risk appetite was improving it is exhibiting an asymmetric reaction to risk by strengthening when risk appetite is declining.  Its positive reaction to higher risk aversion should come as no surprise as it has been the most sensitive and positively correlated currency with risk aversion since the crisis began. 

Nonetheless, the Japanese authorities will likely step up their rhetoric attempting to direct the yen lower before it inflicts too much damage on recovery prospects.   The urgency to do so was made clear from another drop in domestic machinery orders last week as well as the poor performance of Japanese equities.  

The US dollar is also benefitting from higher risk aversion and is likely to continue to grind higher in the current environment.  Risk currencies such as the Canadian, Australian and New Zealand dollars, will be most vulnerable to a further sell off but will probably lose most ground against the yen over the coming days.   These currencies are facing a double whammy of pressure from both higher risk aversion and a sharp drop in commodity prices.    Sterling and the euro look less vulnerable but will remain under pressure too.   

There are some data releases that could provide direction this week in the US such as retail sales, housing starts, Empire and Philly Fed manufacturing surveys.  In addition there is an interest rate decision in Japan, and inflation data in various countries. The main direction for currencies will come from equity markets and Q2 earnings reports, however.  

So far the rise in risk aversion has not prompted big breaks out of recent ranges in FX markets.  However, unless earnings reports and perhaps more importantly guidance for the months ahead are very upbeat, there is likely to be more downside for risk currencies against the dollar but in particular against yen crosses where most of the FX action is set to take place.

Posted in Bond markets, central banks, Commodities, Currencies, Economics, Economy, equity markets, Financial crisis, Monetary Policy, US. Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Leave a Comment »

What the G8 communiqué didn’t say

June 15, 2009 — Mitul Kotecha

There was a stark contrast between the outcome of the weekend’s G8 meeting in Lecce, Italy, and April’s G20 summit in London.  For a start, the tone was far more positive than in London, with Finance Minsters attending the meeting indicating that economic forecasts may need to be revised upwards rather than the steady stream of downward revisions seen over recent months.

The overall tone was one of cautious optimism.  The communiqué noted “there are signs of stabilization in our economies, including a recovery of stock markets, a decline in interest rate spreads, improved business and consumer confidence”.  However, at the behest of the UK the comments “but the situation remains uncertain and significant risks remain to economic and financial stability” was inserted into the final communiqué.   Such an inclusion is logical and at least suggests that officials are not getting to carried away with the improvement in recent data. 

Officials also began discussing “exit strategies” in terms of withdrawing massive global monetary and fiscal stimulus and even requested the IMF look at the issue in more detail.  Whilst it is premature to even discuss exit strategies the comments were clearly aimed at easing bond market concerns about widening fiscal deficits and inflation risks.  As Tim Geithner highlighted, recovery would be stronger if “if we make clear today how we get back to fiscal sustainability when the storm has fully passed”.   Nonetheless, a mere discussion about exit strategy is highly unlikely to remove the current angst that has built up in bond markets globally. 

Additionally, the communiqué included a commitment to develop standards governing the conduct of international business and finance, international regulatory reform, exchange of information for tax purposes and a commitment to refrain from protectionism.   None of these points will move markets this week and all were unsurprising discussion points. 

So what was missing?  The issue of stress tests on European banks was left out of the final communiqué even though it was discussed at the meeting. Reported disagreements with Germany and France over transparency over the publication of stress test results meant that an agreement could not be reached.  This is a big disappointment.  I have written about the issue in two previous posts “European economy in a whole lot of trouble” and “Stress testing European and UK banks” on my blog Econometer.   The fact that more wasn’t done will mean that uncertainty about the health of balance sheets in particular of banks in Germany will remain a constraint to European recovery.  At the least it will make it increasingly likely that in addition to a sharp decline in European growth this year GDP could also drop in 2010.

In addition, economic data continues to lag in the Eurozone compared to the improving signs in the US and elsewhere as highlighted by the huge 21% annual drop in April Eurozone industrial production at the end of last week.  This data even led to another omission with reference to “encouraging figures in the manufacturing sector” previously included in the draft dropped in the final communiqué.   It is clearly too early to talk about manufacturing recovery.

Also missing in the final communiqué was any reference to currencies. Although it was always unlikely that FX would be a major topic at the meeting due to the absence of central bankers attending, the drop in the dollar and concerns from foreign official investors (see a recent post on my blog “Are foreign investors really turning away from US debt”) raised the prospect that there would be some international backing of the US “strong dollar” policy led by the US. 

In the event there wasn’t any comment, but dollar positive comments on the sidelines of the meeting will likely limit any pressure on the dollar this week.  The dollar will be helped by comments on the sidelines of the G8 meeting as well as important comments from Russian Finance Minister Kudrin who stated that he has full confidence in the dollar with no immediate plans to move to a new reserve currency. Ahead of the meeting of BRIC countries this week the comments from Russia add further evidence that there will be no plan to move away from the dollar. Moreover, geopolitical tensions including the protests over the results of Iran’s elections as well as more jawboning from North Korea will work in favour of the dollar this week. 

The euro could look especially vulnerable this week. The lack of attention on European banks stress tests will be a disappointment for those hoping for more transparency and will act as a further drag on the euro.  This is likely to see the euro struggle to make much headway this week, with the recent high above 1.43 likely to provide tough resistance to any move higher in EUR/USD, with a bigger risk of a pull back towards the 1.37-1.38 levels.

Posted in bank rescue, Bond markets, central banks, Currencies, Economics, Economy, Europe, Financial crisis, Germany, Monetary Policy, US. Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . 2 Comments »

European economy in a whole lot of trouble

June 11, 2009 — Mitul Kotecha

Concerns about the health of European banks, particularly German banks, and the pace of Eurozone economic recovery have intensified.  Warnings by the European Central Bank’s (ECB) about further financial sector weakness if there is not a “V” shaped recovery reveal the extent of such concerns.  Attention is increasingly focusing on a lack of transparency and the fact that European regulators are not releasing the results of industry wide stress tests in contrast to the recently released results of US bank stress tests.  Such problems have not gone unnoticed in Germany and even the bank regulator in the country said recently that toxic assets at German bank could blow up “like a grenade”. 

It’s worth noting that the IMF’s estimates for future writedowns and capital requirements in its financial stability report suggest that European banks have much more to do than their US counterparts. See an earlier post titled “Stress testing European and UK banks”.   The IMF repeated its warnings this week as it wrapped up its consultations with European officials, whilst US Treasury Secretary Geithner is set to pressure European authorities to carry out tougher stress tests at this week’s G8 meeting.   Germany has taken some steps towards resolving its banking sector problems and this week the German cabinet agreed to support a “bad bank” plan.  Nonetheless, the task will not be easy as Germany is estimated to have over $1 billion in toxic assets, with consolidation of the regionally owned Landesbanken a major concern. 

The prospect of a “V” shaped recovery in Europe is extremely limited.  Warnings about the pace of eurozone economic recovery should be taken seriously.  However, some officials such as the ECB’s Quaden are already talking about an exit strategy, which looks very premature given the likely slower recovery in the eurozone compared to the US over the coming months.  Whilst the US economy is set to see positive growth next year, albeit below trend, Europe is facing a second year of economic contraction.   Moreover, the drop in Eurozone growth in 2009 is likely to be far steeper than the US, with the economy set to decline by close to 5%.  The bigger than forecast 21.6% annual drop in German industrial production in April and the 29% annual drop in April exports released this week provided a timely reminder of the pressure on Eurozone’s biggest economy.  Given the fact that the German economy is still highly reliant on export growth the data were particularly worrying. 

Against this background and with inflation continuing to drop, the ECB is highly unlikely to raise interest rates until the beginning of 2011 at the earliest.  The fact that ECB officials are even talking about an exit strategy seems completely at odds with the reality of the situation.  As it is the ECB’s EUR 60 billion covered bond purchase plan will have a limited impact, and the policy can hardly be labeled as aggressive.  

Even so, there is no indication that the ECB is about to embark on more aggressive credit or quantitative easing.   The latest ECB monthly report predicts that growth in the eurozone will begin to pick up by the middle of next year but admits that inflation could turn negative over coming months.   Surely this will give the ECB further room to maintain easy monetary policy.   Once again disagreements within a 16 nation ECB council will result in compromise at a time when the eurozone economy is crying out for decisive policy actions.   Growth and banking sector concerns will also be a factor that helps to prevent the euro from fully capitalising on any weakness in the dollar.

Posted in central banks, Economics, Economy, Europe, Financial crisis, Germany, Interest rates, Monetary Policy. Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . 4 Comments »

Are foreign investors really turning away from US debt?

May 29, 2009 — Mitul Kotecha

The press has been full of stories about the dangers to US credit ratings and growing concerns by foreign official investors about the value of their holdings of US Treasury bonds.   A combination of concerns about the rising US fiscal deficit, Fed quantitative easing and potential monetization of US debt, have accumulated to fuel such fears. Given the symbiotic relationship between China and the US it is perhaps unsurprising that China has been one of the most vocal critics. I have highlighted this in past posts, especially related to the risks to the US dollar. Please refer to US dolllar beaten by the bears and US dolllar under pressure. However, my concerns that foreign investors have been shunning US Treasuries recently may have proved somewhat premature.

Should China or other large reserves holders pull out of US asset markets, it would imply a sharp rise in US bond yields and a much weaker dollar.  However, it is not easy for China or any other central bank to act on such concerns.  China is faced with a “dollar trap” in that any decline in their buying of US Treasuries would undoubtedly reduce the value of their existing Treasury holdings as well as drive up the value of the Chinese yuan as the dollar weakens.  Such a self defeating policy would clearly be unwelcome. 

One solution that China has proposed to reduce the global reliance on the dollar and in turn US assets was to make greater use of Special Drawing Rights (SDRs) which I discussed in a previous post, but in reality this would be fraught with technical difficulties and would in any case take years to achieve.  Nor will it be quick or easy for China to persuade other countries to make more use of the yuan in the place of the dollar.  The first problem in doing so is that fact that the yuan is not a convertible currency and therefore foreign holders would have difficulties in doing much with the currency.  

Foreign official concerns are understandable but whether this translates into a major drop in buying of US Treasuries is another issue all together.  Foreign countries have been gradually reducing their share of dollars in foreign exchange reserves over a period of years.  This is supported by IMF data which shows that dollar holdings in the composition of foreign exchange reserves have fallen from over 70% in 1999 to around 64% at the end of last year.

In contrast the share of euro in global foreign exchange reserves has increased to 27% from 18% over the same period.  This process of diversification likely reflects the growing importance of other major currencies in terms of trade and capital flows, especially the euro, but the pace of diversification can hardly be labeled as rapid. 

Importantly, there is no sign that there has been an acceleration of diversification over recent weeks or months.  Fed custody holdings for foreign official investors have held up well.  In fact, these holdings have actually increased over recent weeks.  Moreover, the share of indirect bids (foreign official participation) in US Treasury auctions have been strong over recent weeks.  Taken together it provides yet more evidence that foreign official investors haven’t shifted away from US bonds despite all the rhetoric. 

Posted in Asia, Bond markets, central banks, China, Currencies, Economics, Economy, Europe, US, US administration. Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . 5 Comments »
« Older posts
Newer posts »