Stressing About European Stress Tests

Equities and risk appetite were bolstered by the relative success of the Spanish bond auction on Thursday. The results of the auction in which Spain sold EUR 3 billion in 10 year notes helped to stem some of the pressure on eurozone bond spreads, which despite the generalized improvement in market sentiment over recent days, had been continuing to widen.

Another key indicator that has been suggested that all is not well moving in the opposite direction to the improvement in many risk indicators is the Baltic Dry Index which has dropped by around a third since 26th May 2010.

Perhaps more significant in terms of providing sustainable support for markets was the news that the European Union agreed to publish the results of bank stress tests, slated for the second half of July. This could turn out to be a key stepping stone towards increasing the transparency of the eurozone banking sector.

However, doubts will remain until there is some clarity on the terms of the tests such as whether they include details of sovereign debt exposure. Also, if the stress tests reveal shortcomings in the banks in question it is unclear if government funding will be provided for them. Although the publishing of stress test results is a step in the right direction until these and other questions are answered it is difficult to see markets getting too excited.

It’s not all plain sailing for equity markets despite the relatively positive news in Europe as disappointing US data in the form of a surprise jump in weekly jobless claims and a bigger than expected drop in the June Philly Fed survey weighed in on the side of those expecting both a slow and jobless recovery in the US.

The CHF has been a key mover following the Swiss National Bank policy decision. The decision to leave interest rates unchanged was no surprise, but the change in rhetoric towards a less aggressive stance towards CHF strength opens up the floodgates for CHF buyers. will look to test its all time low around 1.3720.

Another central bank that has shown concern about a strengthening currency is the Bank of Japan but unlike the SNB Japan’s central bank has not intervened for several years. The BoJ in the minutes of its May meeting noted that it will “watch if Europe’s crisis strengthens JPY”, indicating some concern about JPY strength.

This sentiment that was echoed by the Japanese government in the release of Economic Growth Strategy aimed at avoiding an excessive rise in the JPY via fiscal and monetary steps to beat deflation. The JPY barely reacted to both the minutes and the growth strategy, with market players likely sceptical until concrete measures are actually implemented.

It still look like an environment of sell on rallies for the EUR and other risk currencies, with their gains likely to run out of steam over coming days. The next key technical level for EUR/USD is around 1.2454, a level that will prove a tough nut to crack.

Watch out for the pitfalls in H2 2009

Equity and credit markets have begun the second half of 2009 looking quite fatigued, which is not a good sign ahead of the Q2 earning season.   Perhaps the fact that markets have come so far in such a short period of time has itself prompted a pause. An alternative explanation is that the summer lull is kicking in, with many investors taking the end of H1 2009 as an excuse to book profits and wait until activity picks up again post summer holidays.  A more worrying and more likely explanation is that the massive improvement in market sentiment seen in H1 2009 is  giving way to uncertainty.

Relief that there will be no collapse of the global financial system is not sufficient to keep the momentum in equity and credit markets going into the second half of the year. Until now there has been plenty of less negative news and use of the now worn phrase “green shoots”, but little information to judge the magnitude and speed of recovery going forward.

There are plenty of factors that will dampen recovery in the months ahead. Higher unemployment, massive wealth loss and increased savings will provide a clear downdraft to the global economy. Banks will be increasingly laden with bad loans due to credit card delinquencies, commercial real estate defaults and other sour loans and are unlikely to step up lending in a hurry. In addition, it is still unclear how quickly toxic debt will be removed from banks’ balance sheets, which will act as another impediment to recovery.

Risks outside the US remain significant. Although the outlook for China is improving it is unclear whether the momentum of growth in the country will continue once current stimulus measures are utilised. Much will also depend on whether China and other export economies can shift growth impetus from external demand to domestic demand.

Moreover, concerns about the dollar’s use as a reserve currency continue to intensify as various large reserve holders attempt to diversify away from the dollar.  Although a dollar collapse is unlikely the risk that foreign investors reduce their exposure to US Treasuries remains a threat to the dollar.   This could push up long term interest rates and in turn mortgage rates in the US.  

The European economy is a particular riskto global recovery, with only a gradual recovery expected.  In particular, the biggest Eurozone economy Germany is struggling in the wake of a collapse in exports and a lack of domestic demand. Moreover, banking sector issues remain unresolved especially as there has been little information on European bank stress tests. The relative strength of the euro and inability of some countries in the Eurozone to devalue their way out of the downturn will also dampen recovery prospects.   These factors suggest that Europe will lag the recovery in other countries such as the US and UK where the policy response has arguably been more aggressive.  

The jobs market will lag the recovery process but there are signs that things are becoming less severe.  The pace of job losses in many countries is lessening.   In the US for example, non farm payrolls report revealed that average monthly job losses in the second quarter of 2009 at 436k were much lower than the 691k average monthly job losses in the first quarter.  The bad news however, is that unemployment rates continue to rise.  In the US the unemployment rate is likely to head to around 10% from 9.5% currently and this will be echoed in Europe where the unemployment is at a 10-year high of 9.5% currently. 

The bottom line is that the market rally may have been justified so far but there is little to carry the momentum forward. Equity valuations dropped to low levels in March but can be hardly considered cheap at present. The improvements in indicators of market stress have also reached dramatic levels and going forward there will be plenty of pitfalls in the months ahead.

Recovery efforts pay off in the first half of 2009

At the end of last year it looked distinctly like the global financial system was on the verge of meltdown and that the global economy was about to implode.  The change in market sentiment since has been dramatic.  Various banking sector bailouts, the pledge of as much as $2 trillion to support the US financial system, passage of the $819 billion stimulus plan by the US administration and G20 agreement pledging $1 trillion for the World Economy, were major events over the first half of the year which helped to turn sentiment around. 

More rate cuts by many central banks and expansion of quantitative easing, with the Fed purchasing $300 billion in Treasuries, and the ECB unveiling a EUR 60 billion covered bond purchase plan, provided a further boost to recovery efforts. This was coupled with the passage of US bank stress tests which at least gave some transparency on the state of US banks’ balance sheets. 

These efforts appear to be paying off as confidence has improved, data releases especially in Q2 09 have revealed a much smaller pace of deterioration, whilst some US banks felt confident enough to pay back TARP funds, marking a turning point for the US financial sector. 

Markets reacted to all of this news positively once it became clear that a systemic crisis had been avoided; most US and European indices, with the notable exception of the Dow ended H1 2009 with positive returns.  However, their gains were less impressive when compared to the strong gains in some emerging equity markets, with indices in China and India registering gains above 50% this year as recovery efforts in emerging markets echoed those in the G10, but with the advantage of far less severe banking sector problems.  

Currency markets have also given up the high volatility seen at the start of the year as many currencies have now settled into well worn ranges.  Measures of equity market volatility have also swung sharply over H1 2009, with the VIX index now less than half of its 20 January peak. Other measures of market stress have undergone significant improvement, with much of this taking place in Q2.   For instance, the Libor-OIS spread dropped to its lowest level since the beginning of 2008 and after peaking at close to 450bps in October 2008, the Ted spread has now dropped to a level last seen in late 2007.  The change in market sentiment over H1 was truly dramatic but there is little or no chance that this will continue in H2 2009 as I will explain in my next post.

What the G8 communiqué didn’t say

There was a stark contrast between the outcome of the weekend’s G8 meeting in Lecce, Italy, and April’s G20 summit in London.  For a start, the tone was far more positive than in London, with Finance Minsters attending the meeting indicating that economic forecasts may need to be revised upwards rather than the steady stream of downward revisions seen over recent months.

The overall tone was one of cautious optimism.  The communiqué noted “there are signs of stabilization in our economies, including a recovery of stock markets, a decline in interest rate spreads, improved business and consumer confidence”.  However, at the behest of the UK the comments “but the situation remains uncertain and significant risks remain to economic and financial stability” was inserted into the final communiqué.   Such an inclusion is logical and at least suggests that officials are not getting to carried away with the improvement in recent data. 

Officials also began discussing “exit strategies” in terms of withdrawing massive global monetary and fiscal stimulus and even requested the IMF look at the issue in more detail.  Whilst it is premature to even discuss exit strategies the comments were clearly aimed at easing bond market concerns about widening fiscal deficits and inflation risks.  As Tim Geithner highlighted, recovery would be stronger if “if we make clear today how we get back to fiscal sustainability when the storm has fully passed”.   Nonetheless, a mere discussion about exit strategy is highly unlikely to remove the current angst that has built up in bond markets globally. 

Additionally, the communiqué included a commitment to develop standards governing the conduct of international business and finance, international regulatory reform, exchange of information for tax purposes and a commitment to refrain from protectionism.   None of these points will move markets this week and all were unsurprising discussion points. 

So what was missing?  The issue of stress tests on European banks was left out of the final communiqué even though it was discussed at the meeting. Reported disagreements with Germany and France over transparency over the publication of stress test results meant that an agreement could not be reached.  This is a big disappointment.  I have written about the issue in two previous posts “European economy in a whole lot of trouble” and “Stress testing European and UK banks” on my blog Econometer.   The fact that more wasn’t done will mean that uncertainty about the health of balance sheets in particular of banks in Germany will remain a constraint to European recovery.  At the least it will make it increasingly likely that in addition to a sharp decline in European growth this year GDP could also drop in 2010.

In addition, economic data continues to lag in the Eurozone compared to the improving signs in the US and elsewhere as highlighted by the huge 21% annual drop in April Eurozone industrial production at the end of last week.  This data even led to another omission with reference to “encouraging figures in the manufacturing sector” previously included in the draft dropped in the final communiqué.   It is clearly too early to talk about manufacturing recovery.

Also missing in the final communiqué was any reference to currencies. Although it was always unlikely that FX would be a major topic at the meeting due to the absence of central bankers attending, the drop in the dollar and concerns from foreign official investors (see a recent post on my blog “Are foreign investors really turning away from US debt”) raised the prospect that there would be some international backing of the US “strong dollar” policy led by the US. 

In the event there wasn’t any comment, but dollar positive comments on the sidelines of the meeting will likely limit any pressure on the dollar this week.  The dollar will be helped by comments on the sidelines of the G8 meeting as well as important comments from Russian Finance Minister Kudrin who stated that he has full confidence in the dollar with no immediate plans to move to a new reserve currency. Ahead of the meeting of BRIC countries this week the comments from Russia add further evidence that there will be no plan to move away from the dollar. Moreover, geopolitical tensions including the protests over the results of Iran’s elections as well as more jawboning from North Korea will work in favour of the dollar this week. 

The euro could look especially vulnerable this week. The lack of attention on European banks stress tests will be a disappointment for those hoping for more transparency and will act as a further drag on the euro.  This is likely to see the euro struggle to make much headway this week, with the recent high above 1.43 likely to provide tough resistance to any move higher in EUR/USD, with a bigger risk of a pull back towards the 1.37-1.38 levels.

European economy in a whole lot of trouble

Concerns about the health of European banks, particularly German banks, and the pace of Eurozone economic recovery have intensified.  Warnings by the European Central Bank’s (ECB) about further financial sector weakness if there is not a “V” shaped recovery reveal the extent of such concerns.  Attention is increasingly focusing on a lack of transparency and the fact that European regulators are not releasing the results of industry wide stress tests in contrast to the recently released results of US bank stress tests.  Such problems have not gone unnoticed in Germany and even the bank regulator in the country said recently that toxic assets at German bank could blow up “like a grenade”. 

It’s worth noting that the IMF’s estimates for future writedowns and capital requirements in its financial stability report suggest that European banks have much more to do than their US counterparts. See an earlier post titled “Stress testing European and UK banks”.   The IMF repeated its warnings this week as it wrapped up its consultations with European officials, whilst US Treasury Secretary Geithner is set to pressure European authorities to carry out tougher stress tests at this week’s G8 meeting.   Germany has taken some steps towards resolving its banking sector problems and this week the German cabinet agreed to support a “bad bank” plan.  Nonetheless, the task will not be easy as Germany is estimated to have over $1 billion in toxic assets, with consolidation of the regionally owned Landesbanken a major concern. 

The prospect of a “V” shaped recovery in Europe is extremely limited.  Warnings about the pace of eurozone economic recovery should be taken seriously.  However, some officials such as the ECB’s Quaden are already talking about an exit strategy, which looks very premature given the likely slower recovery in the eurozone compared to the US over the coming months.  Whilst the US economy is set to see positive growth next year, albeit below trend, Europe is facing a second year of economic contraction.   Moreover, the drop in Eurozone growth in 2009 is likely to be far steeper than the US, with the economy set to decline by close to 5%.  The bigger than forecast 21.6% annual drop in German industrial production in April and the 29% annual drop in April exports released this week provided a timely reminder of the pressure on Eurozone’s biggest economy.  Given the fact that the German economy is still highly reliant on export growth the data were particularly worrying. 

Against this background and with inflation continuing to drop, the ECB is highly unlikely to raise interest rates until the beginning of 2011 at the earliest.  The fact that ECB officials are even talking about an exit strategy seems completely at odds with the reality of the situation.  As it is the ECB’s EUR 60 billion covered bond purchase plan will have a limited impact, and the policy can hardly be labeled as aggressive.  

Even so, there is no indication that the ECB is about to embark on more aggressive credit or quantitative easing.   The latest ECB monthly report predicts that growth in the eurozone will begin to pick up by the middle of next year but admits that inflation could turn negative over coming months.   Surely this will give the ECB further room to maintain easy monetary policy.   Once again disagreements within a 16 nation ECB council will result in compromise at a time when the eurozone economy is crying out for decisive policy actions.   Growth and banking sector concerns will also be a factor that helps to prevent the euro from fully capitalising on any weakness in the dollar.