Why the Fed should be in no hurry to hike rates

Equity markets struggled to gain traction last week and finally lost ground registering their first weekly decline in month.  It finally looks as though markets are succumbing to the inevitable; the realisation that the recovery is going to be a rocky ride but neither will it be rapid or aggressive.  Markets look as though they have just about run out of fuel and after registering major relief that the global economy was not falling into an endless whole and that financial markets were not going to implode, the equity rally has finally come to a point where it will need more than just news about “green shoots” to keep it going. 

One question that has been raised in particular in bond markets and in interest rate futures pricing is whether these “green shoots” have accelerated the timing of the end of quantitative easing and/or higher interest rates.  Although the markets have retraced some of the tightening expectations that had built in following the May US jobs report there will be a lot of attention on whether the Fed will attempt to allay market concerns that current policy settings will result in inflation running out of control and necessitate a hike in interest rates. 

The Fed’s job shouldn’t be too difficult. In usual circumstances the expansion of the money supply undertaken by the Fed would have had major implications for inflation.  However, the circulation of money (money multiplier) in the economy has collapsed during the recession as consumers have been increasingly reluctant to borrow and lenders have become increasingly reluctant to lend.  The end result has been to blunt the impact of Fed policy.  Of course, once the multiplier picks up the Fed will need to be quick to remove its massive policy accommodation without fuelling a rise in inflation.  If it didn’t it would be bad both for long term interest rates as well as the dollar. 

Although the current policy of quantitative easing is untested and therefore has a strong element of risk attached to it the reality is that the Fed is unlikely to have too much of a problem on its hands.  The explanation for this is that there will be plenty of slack in the economy for months if not years to come.  The labour market continues to loosen and as the US unemployment rate increases most probably well in excess of 10%, wage pressures will continue to be driven down.  

In addition there is plenty of excess capacity in the manufacturing sector and as the May industrial production report revealed the capacity utilisation rate dropped to 68.3%, a hefty 12.6% below its average for 1972-2008.  Inflation data continues to remain subdued as revealed by last week’s release core inflation remains comfortable at a 1.8% annual rate.   Weaker corporate pricing power suggests that core inflation will remain subdued over coming months and will even fall further, so there will be little threat to Fed policy.  

The output gap (difference between real GDP and potential GDP) remains wide and according to CBO estimates of potential GDP the economy will end the year growing at around 8% below its full capacity.  Even if the economy grows above potential for the next few years it may only just close the output gap and subsequently begin fuelling inflation pressures.  The bigger risk is that the economy grows slowly over coming years and takes several years to close the output gap. 

Taking a perspective of past Fed rate hikes following the last two recessions, interest rate markets should take some solace.  In 2001 the Fed begin to hike rates until around 2 ½ years after the end of the recession whilst in the 1990-91 recession rates did not go up until close to 3 years following the end of recession.  Arguably this recession is worse in terms of depth and breadth suggesting that it will take a long time before the Fed even contemplates reversing policy.

What the G8 communiqué didn’t say

There was a stark contrast between the outcome of the weekend’s G8 meeting in Lecce, Italy, and April’s G20 summit in London.  For a start, the tone was far more positive than in London, with Finance Minsters attending the meeting indicating that economic forecasts may need to be revised upwards rather than the steady stream of downward revisions seen over recent months.

The overall tone was one of cautious optimism.  The communiqué noted “there are signs of stabilization in our economies, including a recovery of stock markets, a decline in interest rate spreads, improved business and consumer confidence”.  However, at the behest of the UK the comments “but the situation remains uncertain and significant risks remain to economic and financial stability” was inserted into the final communiqué.   Such an inclusion is logical and at least suggests that officials are not getting to carried away with the improvement in recent data. 

Officials also began discussing “exit strategies” in terms of withdrawing massive global monetary and fiscal stimulus and even requested the IMF look at the issue in more detail.  Whilst it is premature to even discuss exit strategies the comments were clearly aimed at easing bond market concerns about widening fiscal deficits and inflation risks.  As Tim Geithner highlighted, recovery would be stronger if “if we make clear today how we get back to fiscal sustainability when the storm has fully passed”.   Nonetheless, a mere discussion about exit strategy is highly unlikely to remove the current angst that has built up in bond markets globally. 

Additionally, the communiqué included a commitment to develop standards governing the conduct of international business and finance, international regulatory reform, exchange of information for tax purposes and a commitment to refrain from protectionism.   None of these points will move markets this week and all were unsurprising discussion points. 

So what was missing?  The issue of stress tests on European banks was left out of the final communiqué even though it was discussed at the meeting. Reported disagreements with Germany and France over transparency over the publication of stress test results meant that an agreement could not be reached.  This is a big disappointment.  I have written about the issue in two previous posts “European economy in a whole lot of trouble” and “Stress testing European and UK banks” on my blog Econometer.   The fact that more wasn’t done will mean that uncertainty about the health of balance sheets in particular of banks in Germany will remain a constraint to European recovery.  At the least it will make it increasingly likely that in addition to a sharp decline in European growth this year GDP could also drop in 2010.

In addition, economic data continues to lag in the Eurozone compared to the improving signs in the US and elsewhere as highlighted by the huge 21% annual drop in April Eurozone industrial production at the end of last week.  This data even led to another omission with reference to “encouraging figures in the manufacturing sector” previously included in the draft dropped in the final communiqué.   It is clearly too early to talk about manufacturing recovery.

Also missing in the final communiqué was any reference to currencies. Although it was always unlikely that FX would be a major topic at the meeting due to the absence of central bankers attending, the drop in the dollar and concerns from foreign official investors (see a recent post on my blog “Are foreign investors really turning away from US debt”) raised the prospect that there would be some international backing of the US “strong dollar” policy led by the US. 

In the event there wasn’t any comment, but dollar positive comments on the sidelines of the meeting will likely limit any pressure on the dollar this week.  The dollar will be helped by comments on the sidelines of the G8 meeting as well as important comments from Russian Finance Minister Kudrin who stated that he has full confidence in the dollar with no immediate plans to move to a new reserve currency. Ahead of the meeting of BRIC countries this week the comments from Russia add further evidence that there will be no plan to move away from the dollar. Moreover, geopolitical tensions including the protests over the results of Iran’s elections as well as more jawboning from North Korea will work in favour of the dollar this week. 

The euro could look especially vulnerable this week. The lack of attention on European banks stress tests will be a disappointment for those hoping for more transparency and will act as a further drag on the euro.  This is likely to see the euro struggle to make much headway this week, with the recent high above 1.43 likely to provide tough resistance to any move higher in EUR/USD, with a bigger risk of a pull back towards the 1.37-1.38 levels.

Backing the dollar

There has been no let up in the bullish tone to markets over recent weeks. Optimism is dominating. Meanwhile, commodity prices continue to remain firmly supported, with the CRB commodities index up around 30% from its early March low. Bank funding has improved sharply, with indicators such as the Libor-OIS spread moving to its lowest spread since the beginning of February 2008 whilst the Ted spread is now close to where it was all the way back in August 2007.

Conversely, there is not much sign of a let up in pressure on the dollar despite assurances from US Treasury Secretary Geithner during his visit to China. Much of the move in the dollar continues to be driven by improvements in risk appetite but worries about the sustainability of foreign buying of US assets have increased too.

Russia’s proposal to create a new supranational currency has dealt the dollar another blow but it was notable that India, China and South Korea were reported to express confidence in the dollar, stating that there is no alternative to the dollar as a reserve currency. Such comments highlight that despite political motivation to move away from the dollar it is no easy process.

The comments from India, China and South Korea, three of the world’s biggest reserve holders reflect the growing concerns from official accounts about 1) dollar weakness getting out of control and 2) US bond yields pushing higher. Even though foreign central banks will continue to diversify the last thing they want to do is to destroy the value of their massive amounts of US asset holdings so don’t expect a quick move out of dollars from central banks despite the rhetoric from Russia and others.

Russia has said that a debate about the dominance of the USD will take place when BRIC (Brazil, Russia, India and China) countries meet on June 16. Although the rhetoric from Russia may add to dollar worries the reality is that it is highly unlikely that any form of concrete plan will be easily developed to shift away from the dollar. Political motivations aside, even Russian President Medvedev admits it’s an “idea for the future”.

US dollar beaten by the bears

Since I wrote my last post on the US dollar a week ago, US dollar under pressure, the slide in the dollar has accelerated against most currencies. Rather than being driven by an improvement in risk appetite however, it appears that the dollar is being hit by a major shift in sentiment. Indeed currency market dynamics appear be changing rapidly.

In particular, there has been a major breakdown in the relationship between the dollar and equity markets, suggesting that the influence of risk on FX markets is waning. For example, rather than rallying on the back of weaker equity markets over recent days, dollar weakness has actually intensified.

More likely this is becoming a pure and clear slide in sentiment for the dollar. There was some indication of this from the latest CFTC IMM Commitment of traders’ report which is a good gauge to speculative market positioning, showing that net dollar positioning has become negative for the first time in several months.

More evidence of this is the fact that the dollar / yen exchange rate has fallen even as risk appetite has improved. This is at odds with the usual relationship between the Japanese yen and risk appetite. The yen benefited the most from higher risk aversion since the crisis began, strengthening sharply against many currencies. As risk appetite improves and equity markets rally the yen would be expected to weaken the most as risk appetite improves.

I had looked for dollar weakness to accelerate into the second half of 2009 but against some currencies the drop in the dollar has come earlier than anticipated. I also thought that the dollar may stand a chance at a bit of a recovery in the near term if equity markets slipped and risk aversion increased. I was wrong about this. Despite the drop in equities over recent days the USD has also lost ground. Nor has the USD benefited from higher bond yields in the US.

The evidence is clear; USD bearishness is becoming more entrenched and the likelihood of a risk related rebound is becoming more remote even as risk aversion picks up once again. There appears to be a general shift away from US assets in general particularly Treasuries and most likely by foreign official investors who appear to be accelerating their diversification away from the dollar over recent weeks.

The importance of foreign buying of US Treasuries should not be underestimated in terms of its influence on the USD. Foreign purchases of US Treasuries made up 77% of total foreign buying of US securities in 2008. If there is a growing chance of a downgrade to the US’s AAA credit rating in the wake of a budget deficit that will be around $1.85 trillion this year and a rising debt/GDP ratio, the drop in the dollar seen so far may prove to be small compared to downside risks in the months ahead.