Is the Asian FX rally losing steam?

Asian currencies appear to have lost some of their upward momentum over recent days.  Although the outlook remains positive further out, they are likely to struggle to make further gains over coming weeks.  One the one hand strong inflows into Asian equity markets have given support to currencies but on the other hand, data releases reveal only a gradual economic recovery is taking place, with continued pressure on the trade front as seen in the weakness in recent export data in the region.  Even China has been cautious about the prospects of recovery in the country.   

Almost all currencies in Asia have recouped their losses against the US dollar so far this year, with the Indonesian rupiah the star performer, having strengthened by over 11% since the start of the year.  More recently the Indian rupee has taken up the mantle of best performer, strengthening sharply following the positive outcome of recent elections.  The rupee has strengthened by around 3.5% since the beginning of the year and its appreciation has accelerated post elections.   

Much of the gain in the rupee can be attributable to the $4.4 billion of inflows into local equity markets over the last few months, a far superior performance to last year when India registered persistent outflows. Notably in this respect, the Philippines peso is set to struggle as foreign flows into local equities lag far behind other countries in the region.  Inflows into Phililipines stocks have been just $226 million year-to-date as fiscal concerns weigh on foreign investor sentiment.   

South Korea has been the clear winner in terms of equity capital inflows in 2009, with over $6 billion of foreign money entering into the Korean stock market.  Elsewhere, Taiwan has benefited from the prospects of growing investment flows from China and in turn equity market inflows have risen to around $4.3 billion supported by news such as the recent report  that Taiwan will allow mainland Chinese investors to invest in 100 industries.  Equity inflows into these currencies are far stronger than over the same period in 2008, highlighting the massive shift in sentiment towards Asia and emerging markets in general.

Unsurprisingly stock markets in Asia have been highly correlated with regional currencies over recent months, with almost all currencies in Asia registering a strong directional relationship with their respective equity markets.  Recent strong gains in equities have boosted currencies but this relationship reveals the vulnerability of currencies in the region to any set back in equities, which I believe could come from a reassessment of the market’s bullish expectations for Asian recovery.  

Central banks in the region have been acting to prevent a further rapid strengthening in Asian currencies by intervening in FX markets but a turn in equity markets and/or risk appetite could do the job for them and result in a quick shift in sentiment away from regional currencies. The Indonesian rupiah remains one to watch in terms of further upside potential, supported by the Asian Development Bank’s $1bn loan to Indonesia.   The outlook for the Indian rupee also looks favourable as post election euphoria continues.  Nonetheless, the gains in these and other Asian currencies have been significant and rapid and I believe there is scope for a pull back or at least consolidation in the weeks ahead.

Backing the dollar

There has been no let up in the bullish tone to markets over recent weeks. Optimism is dominating. Meanwhile, commodity prices continue to remain firmly supported, with the CRB commodities index up around 30% from its early March low. Bank funding has improved sharply, with indicators such as the Libor-OIS spread moving to its lowest spread since the beginning of February 2008 whilst the Ted spread is now close to where it was all the way back in August 2007.

Conversely, there is not much sign of a let up in pressure on the dollar despite assurances from US Treasury Secretary Geithner during his visit to China. Much of the move in the dollar continues to be driven by improvements in risk appetite but worries about the sustainability of foreign buying of US assets have increased too.

Russia’s proposal to create a new supranational currency has dealt the dollar another blow but it was notable that India, China and South Korea were reported to express confidence in the dollar, stating that there is no alternative to the dollar as a reserve currency. Such comments highlight that despite political motivation to move away from the dollar it is no easy process.

The comments from India, China and South Korea, three of the world’s biggest reserve holders reflect the growing concerns from official accounts about 1) dollar weakness getting out of control and 2) US bond yields pushing higher. Even though foreign central banks will continue to diversify the last thing they want to do is to destroy the value of their massive amounts of US asset holdings so don’t expect a quick move out of dollars from central banks despite the rhetoric from Russia and others.

Russia has said that a debate about the dominance of the USD will take place when BRIC (Brazil, Russia, India and China) countries meet on June 16. Although the rhetoric from Russia may add to dollar worries the reality is that it is highly unlikely that any form of concrete plan will be easily developed to shift away from the dollar. Political motivations aside, even Russian President Medvedev admits it’s an “idea for the future”.

Are foreign investors really turning away from US debt?

The press has been full of stories about the dangers to US credit ratings and growing concerns by foreign official investors about the value of their holdings of US Treasury bonds.   A combination of concerns about the rising US fiscal deficit, Fed quantitative easing and potential monetization of US debt, have accumulated to fuel such fears. Given the symbiotic relationship between China and the US it is perhaps unsurprising that China has been one of the most vocal critics. I have highlighted this in past posts, especially related to the risks to the US dollar. Please refer to US dolllar beaten by the bears and US dolllar under pressure. However, my concerns that foreign investors have been shunning US Treasuries recently may have proved somewhat premature.

Should China or other large reserves holders pull out of US asset markets, it would imply a sharp rise in US bond yields and a much weaker dollar.  However, it is not easy for China or any other central bank to act on such concerns.  China is faced with a “dollar trap” in that any decline in their buying of US Treasuries would undoubtedly reduce the value of their existing Treasury holdings as well as drive up the value of the Chinese yuan as the dollar weakens.  Such a self defeating policy would clearly be unwelcome. 

One solution that China has proposed to reduce the global reliance on the dollar and in turn US assets was to make greater use of Special Drawing Rights (SDRs) which I discussed in a previous post, but in reality this would be fraught with technical difficulties and would in any case take years to achieve.  Nor will it be quick or easy for China to persuade other countries to make more use of the yuan in the place of the dollar.  The first problem in doing so is that fact that the yuan is not a convertible currency and therefore foreign holders would have difficulties in doing much with the currency.  

Foreign official concerns are understandable but whether this translates into a major drop in buying of US Treasuries is another issue all together.  Foreign countries have been gradually reducing their share of dollars in foreign exchange reserves over a period of years.  This is supported by IMF data which shows that dollar holdings in the composition of foreign exchange reserves have fallen from over 70% in 1999 to around 64% at the end of last year.

In contrast the share of euro in global foreign exchange reserves has increased to 27% from 18% over the same period.  This process of diversification likely reflects the growing importance of other major currencies in terms of trade and capital flows, especially the euro, but the pace of diversification can hardly be labeled as rapid. 

Importantly, there is no sign that there has been an acceleration of diversification over recent weeks or months.  Fed custody holdings for foreign official investors have held up well.  In fact, these holdings have actually increased over recent weeks.  Moreover, the share of indirect bids (foreign official participation) in US Treasury auctions have been strong over recent weeks.  Taken together it provides yet more evidence that foreign official investors haven’t shifted away from US bonds despite all the rhetoric. 

Will India remain in the shadows?

Indian markets rejoiced in a big way following the outcome of the elections which put the secular Congress party back into power as the head of the United Progressive Alliance.   Stocks in India rose by a massive 17% and the rupee strengthened as markets gave a huge thumbs up to the outcome.   The margin of victory was bigger than had been expected and allows Congress to form a government with only minimal help from outside parties.  

Given that many had feared that the election would result in another unstable coalition supported by diverse parties each acting in their own interests,  the outcome was very positive.  In the event the result provides Congress with a strong mandate for change and reform.  The real question is whether they will grasp the opportunity or let it slip by and fall further behind into the shadow of China. 

There are of course many challenges that need to be faced on the home front including the alleviation of poverty for a huge chunk of the population, improving education, access to health care etc.   India also needs to move ahead with infrastructure spending, something which remains key to unlocking India’s potential growth and moving towards the pace of growth achieved by China.    As a comparison India spends around 6% of GDP on infrastructure spending compared to around 15% in China.   The results of such spending are obvious when looking at the pace of growth of both countries, with India growing relatively more slowly than China.

The issue is that even if the government has the mandate and the will to move forward with long awaited spending on infrastrucure, finding the money is the main problem.   The Indian government identified the need for $500 billion in infrastructure spending between 2007 and 2012 but the global financial crisis has seen a lot of potential investment disappear as banks bec0me increasingly strapped for cash and foreign investment shrinks due to lack of funding and an aversion to risk.   Restrictions on investments by funds that could potentially invest have also not helped whilst the government is limited in its spending by a huge fiscal deficit.    

The Congress party will need to grasp the opportunity that the election result has brought it and move forward to entice the investment needed to push forward with infrastructure plans.   One of the benefits of India’s slow pace of reform and gradual opening up of the economy is that the country has avoided the worst of the global economic crisis.  Even China will find it a huge challenge to shift its growth engine from export orientated growth to domestic consumption.  India is in a good position to take advantage of its relative resilience and now has a government with a strong mandate to do so.    It would be a great pity for India and the rest of the world, given the potential for the country to become a much stronger trading power, if the government did not take this opportunity by the horns once the celebrations are over.   If not, the rally in Indian markets may prove to have been a fleeting one.