An unusual dollar reaction

Although many market participants are on summer holidays this has not prevented some interesting market moves in the wake of yet more improvement in economic data and earnings.  The most noteworthy release was the July US jobs report which revealed a better than forecast 247,000 job losses and a surprise decline in the unemployment rate to 9.4%.  Moreover, past revisions added 43,000 to the tally.

Although it is difficult to get too optimistic given that job losses since December 2007 have totalled 6.7 million, the biggest drop since WW2, the direction is clearly one of improvement.  Nonetheless, markets were given a dose of reality by the drop in US consumer credit in June, which gives further reason to doubt the ability of the US consumer to contribute significantly to recovery.

The data spurred a further rally in stocks and a sell of in Treasuries.   Such a reaction was unsurprising but the more intriguing move was seen in the US dollar, which after some initial slippage managed a broad based appreciation in contrast to the usual sell off in the wake of better data and improved risk appetite.

It is too early to draw conclusions but the dollar reaction suggests that yield considerations are perhaps beginning to show renewed signs of influencing currencies following a long period where the FX/interest rate relationship was practically non-existent.  Indeed, the strengthening in the dollar corresponded with a hawkish move in interest rate futures as the market probability of a rate hike by the beginning of next year increased.

Since the crisis began the biggest driver of currencies has been risk aversion, a factor that relegated most other influences including the historically strong driver, interest rate differentials, to the background.  More specifically, much of the strengthening in the dollar during the crisis was driven by US investor repatriation from foreign asset markets as deleveraging intensified.   This repatriation far outweighed foreign selling of US assets and in turn boosted the dollar.

Over the past few months this reversed as risk appetite improved and the pace of deleveraging lessened.  Ultra easy US monetary policy also put the dollar in the unfamiliar position of becoming a funding currencies for higher yielding assets and currencies though admittedly this was all relative as yields globally dropped.   The dollar also suffered from concerns about its role as a reserve currency but failed to weaken dramatically as much of the concern expressed by central banks was mere rhetoric.

Where does this leave the dollar now?  Risk will remain a key driver of the dollar but already its influence is waning as reflected in the fact that the dollar has remained range bound over recent weeks despite an improvement in risk appetite.   As for interest rates their influence is set to grow as markets price in rate hikes and as in the past, more aggressive expectations of relative interest rate hikes will play the most positive for the respective currency.

It is still premature for interest rates to overtake risk as the principal FX driver.   Even if rates increase in importance I still believe interest rate markets are overly hawkish in the timing of rate hikes. A reversal in tightening expectations could yet push the dollar lower.  This is highly possible given the benign inflationary environment and massive excess capacity in the US economy.

Eventually the dollar will benefit from the shift in interest rate expectations as markets look for the Fed to be more aggressive than other central banks in reversing policy but this could take some time. Until then the dollar is a long way from a real recovery and will remain vulnerable for several months to come as risk appetite improves further.

Dollar, Euro and Sterling Volatility Within Ranges

Two steps forward, one step back appears to describe the movement of the US dollar over recent weeks.  Although the dollar is still off its lows registered at the beginning of June it has failed to make much of a recovery.  After a solid start to the week the dollar came under renewed pressure ahead of the FOMC decision but managed to register small gains following the lack of action from the Fed on Wednesday. Overall, the Fed showed slightly less concern about disinflation and became slightly less negative on the economic outlook but there was not much in the Fed statement to impact the dollar strongly.

Some comments by ECB officials noting that European interest rates are unlikely to be cut further and that further expansion of stimulus measures are not needed, likely explained some of the recent bounce in the euro versus dollar, but the massive ECB allocation of EUR 442 billion in its 1-year tender on Wednesday helped to push the euro lower once again.  The demand for funds from banks was extremely strong and the ECB responded by providing a huge amount of emergency credit.  The allocation drove down overnight and long term rates as well as weakening the euro. 

I still believe any gain in the euro will be limited especially as the Eurozone data flow continues to suggest that any recovery will be tepid.  Eurozone June PMIs this week revealed a small rise in the manufacturing index but a surprise fall in the services index. There was also some improvement in the French INSEE business confidence indicator but at most the data pointed to a slower pace of contraction and continue to lag the improvement in similar surveys in the US and UK.   EUR/USD appears to be trapped in a 1.38-1.43 range with little momentum to break either side of this. 

FX markets are set to remain volatile but within ranges.  The failure of the dollar to extend gains amidst thin data flow highlights the lack of direction in markets.  I am still biased towards some dollar upside over coming days but once again currencies will take their cue from equity markets.  The dollar may find some support if US equities continue to struggle; the S&P 500 is finding it difficult to sustain gains above its 200 day (897.2) and 50 day (900.54) moving averages, suggesting some scope for a downside move in US stocks an in turn a firmer dollar if the S&P 500 fails to hold above this level.   

GBP/USD looks resilient despite coming under pressure following comments by BoE Chief economist Spencer Dale that a weak currency was a “key channel” to spur growth.  Although GBP has recovered sharply from its low of 1.3549 touched on 26 January it is still looks undervalued and such comments do not necessarily justify a further drop in GBP.   Although GBP/USD is set to appreciate further over the coming months it could struggle to sustain a break above its 3 June high of 1.6663 over the near term.  The downgrade to UK growth forecasts by the OECD this week and comments by BoE governor King that UK recovery will be a “long, hard, slog” highlight the difficulties ahead.

Why the Fed should be in no hurry to hike rates

Equity markets struggled to gain traction last week and finally lost ground registering their first weekly decline in month.  It finally looks as though markets are succumbing to the inevitable; the realisation that the recovery is going to be a rocky ride but neither will it be rapid or aggressive.  Markets look as though they have just about run out of fuel and after registering major relief that the global economy was not falling into an endless whole and that financial markets were not going to implode, the equity rally has finally come to a point where it will need more than just news about “green shoots” to keep it going. 

One question that has been raised in particular in bond markets and in interest rate futures pricing is whether these “green shoots” have accelerated the timing of the end of quantitative easing and/or higher interest rates.  Although the markets have retraced some of the tightening expectations that had built in following the May US jobs report there will be a lot of attention on whether the Fed will attempt to allay market concerns that current policy settings will result in inflation running out of control and necessitate a hike in interest rates. 

The Fed’s job shouldn’t be too difficult. In usual circumstances the expansion of the money supply undertaken by the Fed would have had major implications for inflation.  However, the circulation of money (money multiplier) in the economy has collapsed during the recession as consumers have been increasingly reluctant to borrow and lenders have become increasingly reluctant to lend.  The end result has been to blunt the impact of Fed policy.  Of course, once the multiplier picks up the Fed will need to be quick to remove its massive policy accommodation without fuelling a rise in inflation.  If it didn’t it would be bad both for long term interest rates as well as the dollar. 

Although the current policy of quantitative easing is untested and therefore has a strong element of risk attached to it the reality is that the Fed is unlikely to have too much of a problem on its hands.  The explanation for this is that there will be plenty of slack in the economy for months if not years to come.  The labour market continues to loosen and as the US unemployment rate increases most probably well in excess of 10%, wage pressures will continue to be driven down.  

In addition there is plenty of excess capacity in the manufacturing sector and as the May industrial production report revealed the capacity utilisation rate dropped to 68.3%, a hefty 12.6% below its average for 1972-2008.  Inflation data continues to remain subdued as revealed by last week’s release core inflation remains comfortable at a 1.8% annual rate.   Weaker corporate pricing power suggests that core inflation will remain subdued over coming months and will even fall further, so there will be little threat to Fed policy.  

The output gap (difference between real GDP and potential GDP) remains wide and according to CBO estimates of potential GDP the economy will end the year growing at around 8% below its full capacity.  Even if the economy grows above potential for the next few years it may only just close the output gap and subsequently begin fuelling inflation pressures.  The bigger risk is that the economy grows slowly over coming years and takes several years to close the output gap. 

Taking a perspective of past Fed rate hikes following the last two recessions, interest rate markets should take some solace.  In 2001 the Fed begin to hike rates until around 2 ½ years after the end of the recession whilst in the 1990-91 recession rates did not go up until close to 3 years following the end of recession.  Arguably this recession is worse in terms of depth and breadth suggesting that it will take a long time before the Fed even contemplates reversing policy.